|
Home Page |
Freeing
an animal from a steel jaw leghold trap |
Conibear
Traps | Snare
Traps |
Leghold
Traps |
Camouflaged Snare Trap
Articles and Links | Nevada Trapping Laws | Protected Trails
Talking Points | Bobcat Trapping Issue
Urban Interface | Mick's Story
Trap Incidents -- Stories from people throughout Nevada -
Pets and Unintended Wildlife getting Trapped
http://www.rgj.com/article/20100308/NEWS/100308034
Feds, Nevada officials clash over
deer predator control
By Jeff DeLong • jdelong@rgj.com
• March 8, 2010
An escalating “war” over Nevada’s declining mule deer
population and management of predators such as mountain
lions and coyotes has top officials with the Nevada
Department of Wildlife clashing with members of the
commission that oversees them.
Federal wildlife officials have declined to proceed with
plans to kill lions and other predators — a controversial
proposal approved by the Nevada Wildlife Commission in
December — because the idea is not supported by state
biologists and Ken Mayer, NDOW director. The idea was pushed
by two sportsmen groups which insist the state is doing too
little to protect deer from predators.
After the decision by federal wildlife officials, Nevada
Wildlife Commission Chairman Dr. Gerald Lent, last week
announced formation of a committee to explore new ways to
restore Nevada’s mule deer population, which critics say
the department has failed to do.
“We’ve got a war going on,” said Cecil Fredi,
president of Hunter’s Alert, one of two groups that
successfully petitioned the wildlife commission to approve
three predator-control projects Dec. 5.“Somebody’s got
to do something.”
“The battle between biology and public input is often a
sticking point,” NDOW spokesman Chris Healy said. “This
conflict is not new to Nevada or other Western states.”
But U.S. Department of Agriculture Wildlife Services
officials, who would be hired by the sportsman organizations
to shoot and trap predators, say they
will not do so without full support of Nevada officials.
“It appears that NDOW and the commission have not yet
reached agreement concerning the need for, and the adequacy
of the science to justify” the projects, Jeff Green,
director of the western region of Wildlife Services, wrote
in a Feb. 19 e-mail to Mayer and Lent.“For us to proceed
with conducting those projects while there is disagreement,
and without concurrence from our primary state wildlife
agency partner, would place us in an untenable position,”
Green said. “We also share your desire to work within the
bounds of good science.”
Lent said he and some other commissioners are “not real
happy” with the decision by Wildlife Services. His new
Mule Deer Restoration Committee will explore ways to
increase deer populations, with possible actions including
closing some areas with low deer numbers to hunting or
eliminating doe hunting, Lent said.
“My plan is to listen to the people who live with the deer
day to day,” Lent said, adding a new approach is “long
overdue.”
“The governor gave me and our commission a direct order
— that he wants something done about our declining deer
numbers,” Lent said.
'Bloodthirsty' agenda
Commissioner Scott Raine, who will chair the new committee,
said many factors play into the deer herd troubles but
predators such as lions and coyotes are an “important
component.”
Elko rancher and longtime former Republican state
Assemblyman John Carpenter is on the committee.
“If you don’t get predator control you’re never
going to get the mule deer population or the sage grouse
back. It’s that simple,” Carpenter said. “They
just don’t want to admit predators are a big factor, which
I believe they are.”
Others argue that is an over simplification of a complex
issue, with continuing loss of critical habitat to
development, wildfire and invading cheatgrass among the
primary causes of declining deer numbers.
Tina Nappe, a Reno resident who was the conservationist
representative on the Nevada Wildlife Commission from 1979
to 1994, is among them. Representing the Sierra Club, Nappe
in January urged Wildlife Services to reject a plan she
said provided “no biological documentation of the need.”
Nappe said NDOW and the wildlife commission should never
even have considered the proposals submitted by Hunter’s
Alert and the Nevada Alliance 4 Wildlife. “This was
without a doubt the worst proposal I’ve ever seen,” she
said in a letter to federal officials. “There was no
purpose except they wanted to go out and kill predators.
“The current (wildlife) commission, I would call it
bloodthirsty for killing predators. The majority believes
killing predators will bring back mule deer. That view is
not shared by many sportsmen.”
Among them is Mike McBeath, a sportsmen representative on
the commission who was on the losing end of the 5-4 vote to
approve the predator-control projects.McBeath said while
predator control should play a part where it is
scientifically justified, the commission is overemphasizing
that solution. Commissioners should rely on the expertise of
department biologists, McBeath said.
“The history of this commission is to focus on predators
and they’re doing it in a way I just can’t support,”
McBeath said. “They’ve gone outside their scope of
power.”
In a Feb. 4 letter to Gov. Jim Gibbons, McBeath said he has
“sincere concerns” some fellow commissioners are seeking
to have Mayer dismissed as NDOW director because he opposes
the proposals.
Among McBeath’s concerns are that approval of such
projects could provide political ammunition to environmental
groups and other critics, resulting in lawsuits or petition
drives that could impair the state’s ability to control
predators such as mountain lions.
Approving such proposals by sportsmen groups “with no
backing of NDOW because there is no biological support for
the project, will be spun by environmental groups and others
as nothing more than the indiscriminate killing of
predators,” McBeath wrote Gibbons. “This will give this
commission, NDOW, Nevada and you a huge black eye in the
eyes of the public.”
As an alternative, NDOW biologists proposed other efforts
such as killing mountain lions and coyotes threatening a
relatively small deer herd in the Simpson Park Mountains in
Lander and Eureka counties. The commission rejected that
proposal in favor of the sportsmen groups’ larger plans.
Problem widespread
Tony Wasley, NDOW mule deer specialist, said controlling
predators won’t stop the disappearance of the
sagebrush-covered terrain that deer depend on in Nevada and
much of the West.
“We’re talking about a landscape-scale phenomenon here,”
Wasley said. “The population is limited by habitat.”
Where there is insufficient habitat, “all the predator
control in the world won’t result in any benefit,”
Wasley said.
Raine said the situation has him frustrated by what he views
as an “agenda not to cooperate” with commissioners by
top NDOW officials.
“Science is being used as an excuse for what the
administration is doing and it’s not good science either,”
Raine said. “I wish we could come to some sort of
agreement but that’s not the way it seems to be headed.”
Sidebars
Predator control projects
On Dec. 5, the Nevada Wildlife Commission approved three
projects sought by private sportsmen groups to kill
predators of mule deer and sage grouse. The U.S. Department
of Agriculture’s Wildlife Services has declined to proceed
with killing the animals because state biologists say it is
not justified scientifically.
Projects proposed in fiscal 2010:
o $113,200 to kill mountain lions and coyotes to protect
mule deer herds in areas of Elko and Lander counties.
o $50,000 to kill lions and coyotes to protect mule deer in
parts of Humboldt, Lander, Eureka, White Pine, Lincoln and
Clark counties.
o $50,000 to kill coyotes, badgers, skunks and ravens to
protect sage grouse in parts of Elko and Lander counties.
o The projects would be funded by the NDOW Wildlife Heritage
fund, raised with fees charged from the purchase of hunting
tags to finance projects benefiting wildlife.
Nevada mule deer population
1976: 95,000.
1980: 127,500.
1985: 155,500.
1988: 240,000.
1990: 202,000.
1995: 118,000.
2000: 133,000.
2005: 107,000.
2009: 106,000.
Source: Nevada Department of Wildlife
|